# Website redesign seo: Website Quality Benchmark

> The median published figure in the Website Quality Benchmark is 84.50 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 84 to 85 percent), read 15 September 2026.

Stagenix · https://stagenix.com/datasets/website-quality-benchmark/ · computed 2026-09-15

**Median published figure:** 84.5 % (range 84 to 85 %; 2 sources with a figure; 2 of 10 sources read publish one).

2 of the 10 named sources read in full publish a figure; 7 publish none, read 15 September 2026.

## Every figure, with its source

One row per source: the figure the source's own page publishes, the page, and the day it was read.

| Source | Figure | Read |
|---|---|---|
| [almanac.httparchive.org](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/accessibility) | 85 % | 2026-09-12 |
| [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2024: accessibility](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2024/accessibility) | 84 % | 2026-09-12 |

## The sentence each figure was read from (2)

- [almanac.httparchive.org](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/accessibility), read 2026-09-12: "Compared to 2024, the median Lighthouse Accessibility score improved by 1%, reaching over 85% in 2025."
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2024: accessibility](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2024/accessibility), read 2026-09-12: "The median score for Lighthouse Accessibility audits rose to 84% over the past two years."

## Read in full, publishes no figure

- [WebAIM Million annual accessibility analysis](https://webaim.org/projects/million/), read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2025: performance](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/performance), read 2026-09-12: every candidate on the page was refused
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac methodology](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/methodology), read 2026-09-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- [HTTP Archive state of the web reports](https://httparchive.org/reports/state-of-the-web), read 2026-09-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- [Google web.dev Core Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals), read 2026-09-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- [Chrome UX Report methodology](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/methodology), read 2026-09-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- [Google Search Central: site moves with URL changes](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url-changes), read 2026-09-12: read in full and no accepted figure on the page

## Methodology

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2). 2 of the 10 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 7 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 0 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere. The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in % (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 27 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded. Derivation as chartered: the measured state of the web joined across the three public measurements - the Core Web Vitals pass rate from CrUX at its published thresholds, the median Lighthouse accessibility score and the error counts from the Web Almanac, and the WebAIM Million's home-page failure rate - read as a SERIES year on year and cut to the verticals this estate's other datasets cover, so a buyer sees the number their redesign has to beat rather than a global average; beside it the migration requirement table generated from the search engines' own site-move documentation (what must redirect, what must be resubmitted, what is expected to move and when)

## Sources

- [WebAIM Million annual accessibility analysis](https://webaim.org/projects/million/) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2025: accessibility](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/accessibility) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2025: performance](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/performance) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2024: accessibility](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2024/accessibility) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [HTTP Archive Web Almanac methodology](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/methodology) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [HTTP Archive state of the web reports](https://httparchive.org/reports/state-of-the-web) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [Google web.dev Core Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [Chrome UX Report methodology](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/methodology) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [Google Search Central: site moves with URL changes](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url-changes) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- [almanac.httparchive.org](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2025/accessibility) (the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)

## Cite or embed

- The median published figure in the Website Quality Benchmark is 84.50 percent across 2 sources' own pages (range 84 to 85 percent), read 15 September 2026.
- 2 of the 10 named sources read in full publish a figure; 7 publish none, read 15 September 2026.

Cite as: "Stagenix Website Quality Benchmark", updated 2026-09-15, https://stagenix.com/datasets/website-quality-benchmark/.

CSV: https://stagenix.com/datasets/website-quality-benchmark.csv
JSON: https://stagenix.com/datasets/website-quality-benchmark.json
Embed (plain HTML, static link back): see https://stagenix.com/datasets/website-quality-benchmark/#median